The University of Sheffield
Browse
PITSTOP_Protocol_v3.0.pdf (602.11 kB)

The PITSTOP Study: PIlonidal sinus Treatment: STudying the OPtions - Protocol

Download (602.11 kB)
Version 2 2024-03-22, 11:18
Version 1 2019-04-09, 08:03
workflow
posted on 2024-03-22, 11:18 authored by Steven Brown, Daniel HindDaniel Hind, Catherine Graham, Craig Wilkinson, Jon Lund, Asha Senapati, Jonathon Morton, Christine Moffatt, Matthew Lee, Peter Vaughan Shaw, Philip ShackleyPhilip Shackley, Michael BradburnMichael Bradburn, Ellen LeeEllen Lee, Peter Wysocki, Emily Strong, Farhat Din, Heather DakinHeather Dakin


The PITSTOP study is a multi centre UK observational study looking at the treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease. To identify healing rates, recurrence and re-intervention, we will recruit consecutive, consenting adults with pilonidal sinus, considered suitable for surgery in NHS trusts with large pilonidal practices. Classification will be by anatomy/pathology of pit and tracks. We will record method of excision (minimal, major, curettage) and closure (none, midline, lateral, flap, glue, phenol injection).

A survey of current practice will be conducted with current consultants in the UK also to assess current treatment practices for pilonidal sinus disease.

To get an overview of patient views and experiences as well as assess which interventions patients would rather avoid and which outcomes they most value, we will conduct brief semi-structured interviews. This is to assess which interventions patients would rather avoid and which outcomes they most value.

A Discrete Choice Experiment will also be completed. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are an attribute-based measure of benefit, based on the assumption that health-care interventions, services or policies can be described by their attributes.

A consensus regarding the sub-groups of patients for whom the various interventions may be suited will be generated, along with a consensus working with clinicians and patients, together with a consensus meeting defining appropriate comparators and valued outcomes for any future randomised controlled trial. To do this, a modified nominal group technique consensus exercise will be undertaken.


This study is being conducted by the Clinical Trials Unit at the University of Sheffield. It is sponsored by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals and is Funded by the NIHR HTA.


The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Funding

NIHR HTA 17/17/02

History

Ethics

  • The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field

Policy

  • The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

  • The uploaded data can be shared openly

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Usage metrics

    School of Health and Related Research

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC