A systematic review of Clinical Decision Rules in the management of adult minor head injury
posterposted on 03.03.2020 by Alastair Pickering, Susan Harnan, Abdullah Pandor, Stephen Goodacre
Poster sessions are particularly prominent at academic conferences. Posters are usually one frame of a powerpoint (or similar) presentation and are represented at full resolution to make them zoomable.
Computed tomography (CT) of the head is the diagnostic standard for identifying intracranial injury. Routine CT of all minor head injury patients would result in a large number of normal CT scans being performed with associated risks of radiation exposure and waste of health care resources. Researchers have therefore attempted to derive clinical decision rules to identify those at risk of intracranial injury based on clinical characteristics at presentation in order to select them for imaging. It is currently unclear how existing rules compare in terms of diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to systematically identify clinical decision rules for adults with minor head injury and compare the decision/prediction rules in terms of estimated diagnostic accuracy for any intracranial injury and injury requiring neurosurgery.
EthicsThere is no personal data or any that requires ethical approval
PolicyThe data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing
Sharing and access restrictionsThe data can be shared openly
- The file formats are open or commonly used
Methodology, headings and units
- Headings and units are explained in the files