File(s) not publicly available

Reason: this work is still not published

Honeybees “cheat” on math tests: examining the use of numerosity in numerical cognition tasks

software
posted on 09.04.2020 by HaDi MaBouDi, Andrew Barron, James Marshall, Cwyn Solvi

Recently, impressive numerical abilities have been claimed for animals like honeybees. Here we critique whether the learning tests used are sufficient evidence for numerical cognition, or whether there are alternative explanations for the behaviour seen. We replicated the methods used in honeybee studies in which bees were trained to discriminate visual stimuli that varied in number of elements. Bees performed similarly to those in the original study. Additional control tests showed, however, that bees had learned continuous (non-numerical) cues of the stimuli that covaried with numerosity and not number itself. Further, we created a simple model containing just nine elements that learned the continuous cues of training stimuli only, with no numerical processing. This model was able to reproduce all behaviour in learning tests that had been considered indicative of numerical cognition. Our results caution a revaluation of recent claims of numerical abilities of honeybees, as well as other works using similar methods.

Funding

Brains on Board: Neuromorphic Control of Flying Robots

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Find out more...

History

Ethics

There is no personal data or any that requires ethical approval

Policy

The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

The data requires access restrictions, explained in the description field, and the files are closed

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Licence

Exports